Submissions on Online Gambling in New Zealand

Online Gambling Review

The Department of Internal Affairs has proactively released submissions made on the review of online gambling in New Zealand.

Redactions have been made consistent with the provisions of the Official Information Act 1982. The majority of redactions fall under Section 9(2)(a) – protecting the privacy of natural persons. All individual names, email addresses, physical addresses and phone numbers have been redacted. Generic organisation names, work email addresses and PO Box addresses have not been redacted. Other redactions refer to the relevant section of the Act. See also: Summary of submissions.

List of organisational submitters (by name):

A - F | G - LM - R |  S - Y

Organisations A-F:

Submissions - Part 1 - A-F (PDF, 8.4MB)
Includes submissions from the following groups: 

Air Rescue and Community Services
Akarana Community Trust
Aktive- Auckland Sport & Recreation
Anglican Care Waiapu
Asian Family Services
Below the Line
Betway
Bowls New Zealand
CERT
Christchurch Casino
Clubs New Zealand Inc
Creative New Zealand
Cystic Fibrosis
Dragon Community Trust
Drummond and Sauer (Authors)
Eastland Sports Foundation Education Trust
FinCap
First Light Community Foundation
Four Winds Foundation

Back to Top

Organisations G-L:

Submissions - Part 2 - Gaming Laboratories International (PDF, 9.7MB) 
Gaming Laboratories International submission only

Submissions - Part 2a - Gaming Laboratories International - Appendix (PDF, 10.7MB) 
Gaming Laboratories International submission - Appendix only

Submissions - Part 2b G-L (PDF, 7.5MB) 
Includes submissions from the following groups: 

Gaming Machine Association of NewZealand
Glen Eden Tennis Club Inc
Grassroots Trust Limited
Greentube
Hamilton City Council Staff
Hauraki District Council
Hawkes Bay District Health Board Hawkes
Bay Fusion Group
Headway Brain Injury Association
Heart Foundation
Hospitality New Zealand
ILT Foundation
International Betting Integrity
Association InternetNZ
Jennian Homes
Levin Women’s Bowling Club
Lotto New Zealand

Back to Top

Organisations M-R:

Submissions - Part 3 - M-R (PDF, 5.5MB) 

Includes submissions from the following groups:

Make a Wish Foundation
Mapu Maia
Marketing Association
Mt Wellington Foundation
Nelson Marlborough District Health Board
New Zealand Association of Counsellors
New Zealand Bankers Association
New Zealand Community Trust
New Zealand Film Commission
New Zealand Football
New Zealand Gambling Commission
New Zealand Football
New Zealand Gambling Commission
New Zealand Telecommunications Forum
Nga Kete Matauranga Punamu Charitable Trust
Office of Film Literature Classification
One Foundation
Prima Networks Limited
Problem Gambling Foundation
Pub Charity Limited
Public Health Association of New Zealand
Racing Industry Transition Agency
Rangitikei Youth Council
Rano Community Trust
Royal New Zealand Coast Guard

Back to Top

Organisations S-Y:

Submissions - Part 4 - S-Y (PDF, 9MB) 

Includes submissions from the following groups:

Safer Napier Strategic Group
SkyCity
SPCA
Sport New Zealand
Surf Life Saving New Zealand
Taeaomanino Trust
The Fundraising Institute
The Lion Foundation
The Remote Gambling Foundation
The Salvation Army
The Southern Trust
Touch New Zealand
Transparency International New Zealand
Trust Aoraki Limited
Western Bay of Plenty District Council
Youthtown

Back to Top

List of individual submitters (by date received - names removed):

1. Submissions received: August 2019 (PDF, 2.5MB)

2. Submissions received: 3-4 September 2019 (PDF, 265KB)

3. Submissions received: 3-4 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 2.5MB)

4. Submissions received: 4 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 1.2KB)

5. Submissions received: 4 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 2.6MB)

6. Submissions received: 4 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 437KB)

7. Submissions received: 5 September 2019 (PDF, 1.4MB)

8. Submissions received: 5 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 115KB)

9. Submissions received: 5 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 95KB)

10. Submissions received: 5 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 97KB)

11. Submissions received: 5 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 89KB)

12. Submissions received: 5 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 2.7MB)

13. Submissions received: 5 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 1.7MB)

14. Submissions received: 5 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 4.6MB)

15. Submissions received: 5-6 September 2019 (PDF, 3.9MB)

16. Submissions received: 6 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 165KB)

17. Submissions received: 6 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 3.3MB)

18. Submissions received: 6 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 1.2MB)

19. Submissions received: 6 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 110KB)

20. Submissions received: 6 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 974KB)

21. Submissions received: 6 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 119KB)

22. Submissions received: 6 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 4.2MB)

23. Submissions received: 6 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 5.2MB)

24. Submissions received: 7 September 2019 (PDF, 3.5MB)

25. Submissions received: 7 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 148KB)

26. Submissions received: 8 September 2019 (PDF, 923KB)

27. Submissions received: 8 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 1.2MB)

28. Submissions received: 9 September 2019 (PDF, 8.6MB)

29. Submissions received: 9 September 2019 (continued) (PDF, 6.2MB)

30. Submissions received: 10 September 2019 (PDF, 6MB)

31. Submissions received: 11 September 2019 (PDF, 2.2MB)

32. Submissions received: 12-13 September 2019 (PDF, 2.9MB)

33. Submissions received: 14-16 September 2019 (PDF, 5.5MB)

34. Submissions received: 17-19 September 2019 (PDF, 3.3MB)

35. Submissions received: 20-24 September 2019 (PDF, 4.5MB)

36. Submissions received: 25-28 September 2019 (PDF, 5.8MB)

37. Submissions received: 29 September - 1 October 2019 (PDF, 2.5MB)

Back to Top

Standard submission responses – Coastguard New Zealand

The Department received submissions containing standard responses in support of Coastguard New Zealand. These responses, including variations have been summarised below:

“I support this proposed law change, so Coastguard can run lotteries online or via phone. It will give me greater choice as to how I buy tickets and help Coastguard to reduce costs so more funds can be used to save lives at sea.”

“I support this proposed law change, so Coastguard can run lotteries online. It will give me greater choice as to how I buy tickets and help Coastguard to reduce costs so more funds can be used to save lives at sea.”

“I support this proposed law change, so Coastguard can run lotteries online or via phone. It will help Coastguard to reduce costs so more funds can be used to save lives at sea.” 

“I support this proposed law change, so Coastguard can run lotteries online or via phone. It will give me greater choice as to how I can buy tickets and help Coastguard to reduce costs so more funds can be used to save lives at sea.”

Back to Top