![]() |
|
||||
|
|||||
Results and Statistics
ResultsBelow are some examples of the complaints we have received and the results of our investigations. Because we are concentrating on educating businesses at this stage the companies involved have not been identified. Historic promotion (November) We received a complaint relating to a jewellery company who had recently sent out a promotional email to various people listed on their database. We visited the companies head office, offsite administration office, company who does their marketing and bulk email provider to investigate further. We discovered that the company ran a specific web based promotion in 2002 where entrants had an opportunity to win a pair of earrings. The conditions of entry of the competition included a clause stating that 'all entries will be added to a database and may receive promotional offers from other businesses in the future'. It also gave a contact email address should entrants want to be removed from the database. Our investigation concluded that the jewellery company had complied with the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007. However, we did recommend that if this company were to run a similar email promotion in the future they should include a reference to where they obtained the recipients email address, as most people would not remember entering a competition in 2002. Deemed consent (December) We received a number of complaints from schools who had been sent emails from businesses offering to sell them goods related to education. Further investigation revealed that the Ministry of Education had a list of all the schools in New Zealand published on their website. This meant the businesses had consent to send the emails because they were conspicuously published, work-related electronic addresses.
On 2 November 2009 the Department announced that the two other people involved in this spamming operation had admitted their role and will pay financial penalties of $100,000 and $50,000. View our press release (02/11/09) for more information. StatisticsBelow are statistics on the number of complaints we have received each month.Latest spam complaints: October 2009 During the month of October 113 spam complaints were received in total. The following tables are a breakdown of the type of spam, its origin and the reason for the complaint.
Archive of spam complaints
NOTE: The number of spam complaints for New Zealand and overseas may be higher than the total number of recorded (archived) spam complaints. This is because each spam complaint is allocated a Complaint Reference Number to help the Department with processing. Sometimes complainants will re-use a Complaint Reference Number when they register further complaints and the system does not recognise this as a new complaint. Also complainants may include two or more spam complaints in the one submission. *This document is in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format. You need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your computer. You can download a free version from the Adobe site. |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Last updated: 02/11/2009 |
|||||||